As soon as I posted the illustration of my first draft of thoughts combining DISC profiling with style personalities, I knew there’d be a revision soon. Why didn’t it work for so-and-so? Entertaining the thought that some of those people were not authentically expressing their natural personality resolved some of the inconsistencies. But not all.
But – yikes! What if it’s me that’s not authentically expressing my natural personality?
Sniffing out the clues: a recent craving for pattern, a feeling of being restricted from expressing my personality more exuberantly until my “nest” is completely empty. Smells fishy!
(In the meantime, I’ve been investigating the Dressing Your Truth system. More on that to come.)
This diagram is roughly the same as the previous, but with the center axis flipped and with less definition of style types. Anybody feel it fits them better?
YIKES!! You’ve done a lot more than just flipped the DISC!! This will take some reflection.
I wonder: What happens if you include all the NFO from the previous diagram also?
Everything stays in exactly the same place.
I think so. My DiSC profile is very high D, S and C with almost nil I, and identical results for both the natural and adaptive interpretations. I think this fits. But I’m still doubtful there would be a strong correlation to be found.
I think it just doesn’t help very much. In that, the things described are just that: described. It doesn’t really give any clues about styles or stores to try or anything very specific. However, for what it is, I’m with you Mel — this is better. 🙂