<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reader Question:  Are Longer Floral Dresses Hopelessly Dated?</title>
	<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/</link>
	<description>from the bottom of the fashion food chain, a conversation about what to wear.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-69784</link>
		<author>Rebecca</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-69784</guid>
		<description>Thanks for leaving a comment, Becky!  I agree with you on the importance of confidence.  And I love the idea of being free of the Wardrobe Dictators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for leaving a comment, Becky!  I agree with you on the importance of confidence.  And I love the idea of being free of the Wardrobe Dictators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-69771</link>
		<author>Becky</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-69771</guid>
		<description>Personally, I was rather appalled at how the author of that post felt the need to generalize.  The worst part to me was at this age you must not wear ___________.  Talk about SHALLOW!

I think it is horrible to even say that at this age you should/should not wear this...it is about your personality/style/and whether you feel CONFIDENT in what you are wearing.  Confidence is the most important--if you feel good in what you wear and it is flattering, forget age!  Just stick with what "works!" 

I also realize that much of what she said in the article was geared toward workplace clothing...no matter WHAT age you are, things like flip flops, club tops, etc. are horribly unprofessional!  I think a better use for that article would be to change the focus to "what not to wear to work" and scrap the age garbage altogether!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I was rather appalled at how the author of that post felt the need to generalize.  The worst part to me was at this age you must not wear ___________.  Talk about SHALLOW!</p>
<p>I think it is horrible to even say that at this age you should/should not wear this&#8230;it is about your personality/style/and whether you feel CONFIDENT in what you are wearing.  Confidence is the most important&#8211;if you feel good in what you wear and it is flattering, forget age!  Just stick with what &#8220;works!&#8221; </p>
<p>I also realize that much of what she said in the article was geared toward workplace clothing&#8230;no matter WHAT age you are, things like flip flops, club tops, etc. are horribly unprofessional!  I think a better use for that article would be to change the focus to &#8220;what not to wear to work&#8221; and scrap the age garbage altogether!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imogen Lamport</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44610</link>
		<author>Imogen Lamport</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44610</guid>
		<description>Floral frocks will always be around, but the patterns and shapes change, and that's what makes them appear either 'current' or 'dated'.

Any pattern, floral or not, dates more quickly than a plain garment, so if you want to get more wear from your clothes, buy plain fabrics as they will have a longer lifespan in your wardrobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floral frocks will always be around, but the patterns and shapes change, and that&#8217;s what makes them appear either &#8216;current&#8217; or &#8216;dated&#8217;.</p>
<p>Any pattern, floral or not, dates more quickly than a plain garment, so if you want to get more wear from your clothes, buy plain fabrics as they will have a longer lifespan in your wardrobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44422</link>
		<author>Karen</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44422</guid>
		<description>Well, I think that model is an exception -- she would look good in many outfits.   For the rest of us, I think the long floral dress is pretty out -- especially if it has been sitting around in the closet for any length of time.  Of course there are always exceptions and maybe we can only count a handful of years before it comes back.  

I have never been a big floral person, but I do have a few 2-color graphic floral skirts I like to wear with solid knit tops and that formula works nicely for me.  I don't think I'll ever wear a long floral dress again, but I know I should never say never!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that model is an exception &#8212; she would look good in many outfits.   For the rest of us, I think the long floral dress is pretty out &#8212; especially if it has been sitting around in the closet for any length of time.  Of course there are always exceptions and maybe we can only count a handful of years before it comes back.  </p>
<p>I have never been a big floral person, but I do have a few 2-color graphic floral skirts I like to wear with solid knit tops and that formula works nicely for me.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever wear a long floral dress again, but I know I should never say never!  <img src='http://betweenmypeers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vildy</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44020</link>
		<author>Vildy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-44020</guid>
		<description>I agree with Christine in part. Those dresses can be worn in such a way that they remind of little girl's dresses and then they're too coy for grown up women. As with everything, it's in how you wear it. If it's bias, simple, languid, appropriate to the season and doesn't look like a stiff feed sack print, I don't see why it wouldn't be fetching on a past 40 woman. Especially worn with a thin strappy sandal and otherwise uncluttered. I love the look of doing a great deal with nothing at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Christine in part. Those dresses can be worn in such a way that they remind of little girl&#8217;s dresses and then they&#8217;re too coy for grown up women. As with everything, it&#8217;s in how you wear it. If it&#8217;s bias, simple, languid, appropriate to the season and doesn&#8217;t look like a stiff feed sack print, I don&#8217;t see why it wouldn&#8217;t be fetching on a past 40 woman. Especially worn with a thin strappy sandal and otherwise uncluttered. I love the look of doing a great deal with nothing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43919</link>
		<author>Christine</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43919</guid>
		<description>I think Allie's 100% correct on everything she said in that post.  I think those LHITP dresses look even sadder on women over 40.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Allie&#8217;s 100% correct on everything she said in that post.  I think those LHITP dresses look even sadder on women over 40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43845</link>
		<author>Rebecca</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43845</guid>
		<description>drwende - actually, you sound like what I wish I could have said

and Jennifer - that goes for you too ... except the part about being 20.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drwende - actually, you sound like what I wish I could have said</p>
<p>and Jennifer - that goes for you too &#8230; except the part about being 20.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43834</link>
		<author>Jennifer</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43834</guid>
		<description>I caught that post on WO and I was... disturbed. I'm 20, and when I read that list, I kind of had this sinking feeling of, "I'm... only ten years away from getting rid of half my wardrobe. These are my last years to dress however I want and feel good about it and once I turn 30 I enter THE ZONE OF BORING full of older women sniping each other behind their backs."

Which really is not true at all - I understand that once you get older, you shouldn't dress like a little girl. And we women, sadly, criticize each other's outfits all the time, no matter the age. But from the tone of the post... throw out this, throw out that, don't be caught wearing this... I really had this impending sense of doom!

In any case, I was also surprised to see some of the things she listed for that list, particularly by the long dress, since I wear this kind of dress to church quite often. Nowhere else though! And always with some sort of cardigan/blazer/button-down on top. I think Sheri is right - you wouldn't wear that dress to the office, but you could to church or other places as appropriate.

But it's also true that this model just made the dress work it for her. I honestly shouldn't wear that style, because I'm short. and it's crucial that the dress fits well (it is so easy for long dresses to look frumpy).

The lingerie tip threw me off too - I thought that buying good lingerie is an investment and practical advice at any age. 

All in all, the post made me really sad, because if I were 30 I really would have to throw out half my wardrobe. Not good for the environment/my wallet either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught that post on WO and I was&#8230; disturbed. I&#8217;m 20, and when I read that list, I kind of had this sinking feeling of, &#8220;I&#8217;m&#8230; only ten years away from getting rid of half my wardrobe. These are my last years to dress however I want and feel good about it and once I turn 30 I enter THE ZONE OF BORING full of older women sniping each other behind their backs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which really is not true at all - I understand that once you get older, you shouldn&#8217;t dress like a little girl. And we women, sadly, criticize each other&#8217;s outfits all the time, no matter the age. But from the tone of the post&#8230; throw out this, throw out that, don&#8217;t be caught wearing this&#8230; I really had this impending sense of doom!</p>
<p>In any case, I was also surprised to see some of the things she listed for that list, particularly by the long dress, since I wear this kind of dress to church quite often. Nowhere else though! And always with some sort of cardigan/blazer/button-down on top. I think Sheri is right - you wouldn&#8217;t wear that dress to the office, but you could to church or other places as appropriate.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s also true that this model just made the dress work it for her. I honestly shouldn&#8217;t wear that style, because I&#8217;m short. and it&#8217;s crucial that the dress fits well (it is so easy for long dresses to look frumpy).</p>
<p>The lingerie tip threw me off too - I thought that buying good lingerie is an investment and practical advice at any age. </p>
<p>All in all, the post made me really sad, because if I were 30 I really would have to throw out half my wardrobe. Not good for the environment/my wallet either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drwende</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43828</link>
		<author>drwende</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43828</guid>
		<description>That model would look fantastic in darned near anything.

I think there's a place in an authoritative businesswoman's wardrobe for a longish, more floaty dress, though in my world that place is often called "Sunday brunch." Whether little calico prints look good depends A LOT on the wearer -- I can only wear black-background prints that are fairly bold, so you won't mistake me for Laura Ingalls. 

But my longer flowered dress is (thanks to its structured cut) considerably more businesslike than the above-the-knee, shoulder-baring "effortless frocks" that are all the rage these days. And if I wanted to wear a sheath, as the ladies suggest, I'd have to go for nylons or more structured undergarments, which in Phoenix's 110-degree summers removes the point of wearing a dress at all.

Do I sound crankier and more emphatic than usual? I think I'm with Vildy on being off-put by the tone of the Ladies Who Dictate Age-Appropriate Attire. Maybe I've been corrupted by living in a city where shorts, a black t-shirt, and a tattoo are ALWAYS appropriate. (I don't have the tattoo!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That model would look fantastic in darned near anything.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a place in an authoritative businesswoman&#8217;s wardrobe for a longish, more floaty dress, though in my world that place is often called &#8220;Sunday brunch.&#8221; Whether little calico prints look good depends A LOT on the wearer &#8212; I can only wear black-background prints that are fairly bold, so you won&#8217;t mistake me for Laura Ingalls. </p>
<p>But my longer flowered dress is (thanks to its structured cut) considerably more businesslike than the above-the-knee, shoulder-baring &#8220;effortless frocks&#8221; that are all the rage these days. And if I wanted to wear a sheath, as the ladies suggest, I&#8217;d have to go for nylons or more structured undergarments, which in Phoenix&#8217;s 110-degree summers removes the point of wearing a dress at all.</p>
<p>Do I sound crankier and more emphatic than usual? I think I&#8217;m with Vildy on being off-put by the tone of the Ladies Who Dictate Age-Appropriate Attire. Maybe I&#8217;ve been corrupted by living in a city where shorts, a black t-shirt, and a tattoo are ALWAYS appropriate. (I don&#8217;t have the tattoo!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Sabin</title>
		<link>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43804</link>
		<author>Jennifer Sabin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betweenmypeers.com/2008/07/30/reader-question-are-longer-floral-dresses-hopelessly-dated/#comment-43804</guid>
		<description>I think this dress works for this model because she is in very good shape and appears to be in her mid-20s. I could NEVER pull this off. This print is too tiny for the average modern women. But I think it looks beautiful on this model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this dress works for this model because she is in very good shape and appears to be in her mid-20s. I could NEVER pull this off. This print is too tiny for the average modern women. But I think it looks beautiful on this model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

